Episode 66: The Partner Buyout, the $4 Billing Error, and Why "Do More With More" Beats Cutting Heads

Apr 10

"We had guns to each other's heads and couldn't pull the trigger. That's what happens when you don't have a real shareholders agreement."

Watch

TL;DR — Key Takeaways

A failed acquisition is often the moment partner misalignment finally surfaces. Ben and his co-founder spent months prepping a sale, then spent another 9-10 months coming to terms with what the process revealed: one wanted an off-ramp, the other wanted a bigger swing.
A 50/50 shareholders agreement with no exit mechanism is a gun both partners hold at each other's heads. Build in a shotgun clause, drag-along, tag-along, and scenarios for death, disability, burnout, and adding partners before you need them.
Decide everything you can before lawyers get involved. Their fees scale with the gaps in your agreement.
If you're the partner who's staying, start running before the closing date. The relay handoff only works if the remaining partner is already moving.
New business lines often come from complaint calls, not strategy sessions. Ben's Cloudflare partnership started with a $4 billing error, a banned domain, and an all-caps email written at 30,000 feet.
Creative and digital agencies are the first line for client security conversations. When the director of marketing mentions spoofed emails, that's where managed security starts, but most agencies drop it at "turn on DMARC."
"Do more with more" beats "do more with less" when you have real leverage. Ben is growing headcount from 12 to 30 while using AI as the work thread that runs through everything. The limit isn't hardware. It's economic and human.

Take the free Signal Check →

Does This Sound Familiar?

You and your co-founder built something together. You pulled profit out for years. You got approached about a sale, went through the acquisition dance, and when it fell apart, something broke that can't be unbroken. The conversations have a different weight now. You're ready for the next move. They're not.

Or maybe the partnership is fine, but AI is rewriting your cost structure faster than you can rewrite your offer. Your peers are trimming heads and calling it a strategy. You're not sure if that's the play for a 12-person shop.

Or you're watching a new opportunity emerge through a back door. A partnership, a channel, a service line your clients actually want. The cautious voice says stay focused. The other voice says this is the window.

Ben Fox has lived all three. This episode is the unfiltered version of what those decisions actually look like from inside.

Take the free Signal Check →

Meet the Guest

Ben Fox is the founder of FP Digital, a managed web operations and DevOps agency he built over 13 years with a co-founder, and ZeroArc, a managed security services practice built around a Cloudflare partnership. FP Digital runs managed hosting, DevOps, and web operations for agencies and direct clients. ZeroArc serves the underserved mid-market segment (100 to 5,000 employees) that needs enterprise-grade security without enterprise overhead.

Visit fpdigital.io →

Episode Summary

1. The 13-year partnership and the moment it fractured

Ben and his co-founder Bart ran a profitable agency for 12 years. Bart's philosophy was simple: don't lose money. That discipline meant 12 profitable years, productized services, and pricing that reflected the work. Ben was the sales and vision side. Bart was the technical anchor.

The fracture came through an acquisition attempt. They entertained a good offer, did the deep work of prepping a sale, and in the process ended up in what Ben described as a counseling session together. What emerged, slowly and then all at once, was that Bart wanted an off-ramp and Ben wanted to take a bigger swing. "Once it was said out loud, that's it. It's the 'I want a divorce' moment." The deal fell through. The realization didn't.

2. Why the shareholders agreement is the conversation you don't want at 25

Ben's advice to younger founders is direct: have a real shareholders agreement. Not a two-page 50/50 document that says you'll figure it out. A real one, with a shotgun clause, drag-along and tag-along rights, and mechanisms for every scenario you hope never happens. Death, disability, divorce, mental capacity, burnout, long breaks, adding a partner later.

Without those mechanisms, Ben and Bart had mutual leverage but no way to use it. Each could technically block the other from moving forward. Neither wanted to. The trust held, but Ben is clear that trust isn't a substitute for structure. "Your partnership is going to dissolve. One way or the other, your partnership's going to end. So structure it."

3. The actual mechanics of a buyout

Ben was candid about what a partner buyout looks like from inside. The lawyer bill is larger than you expect. The details nobody tells you about (directors' liability, E&O insurance continuity, cell phone ownership, tax implications) all need to be negotiated. His advice: decide as much as possible before the lawyers are in the room.

He also described the moment he and Bart realized they were talking through lawyers and fighting about the wrong thing. One phone call, one honest conversation, and the issue resolved in a day. "I said, 'I'm so mad at you.' He said, 'I'm pissed at you too.' I said, 'Well, I'm glad we figured that out. Now what's the problem?'" The lesson: lawyers amplify distance. Partners who still trust each other can close it faster than any filing.

4. The relay handoff

For the partner who's staying, Ben's advice is to start running before the closing date. "If you wait until the final closing date, it's too late." He compared it to a marathon: the clock starts when you cross the start line, but if you're at the back of the pack, you've already lost a half mile. Bart let Ben promote people into a leadership team, hire a COO, and start executing the plan well before the buyout closed. By the time Ben was officially the sole owner, the new organization was already functioning.

"Once I accepted that I had a vision and that he didn't want to be part of it, and for the first time in our partnership he said no and I said, 'Well, I want to do it anyway,' that kicked off the conversation."

5. The $4 billing error that became a Cloudflare partnership

The ZeroArc origin story is one of the better accidental-business stories on the show. Ben was on vacation in the Dominican with his wife. Their largest client's site went down. His team diagnosed it: Cloudflare had a $4 billing error on a test account, banned a subdomain, and because the hosting company used Cloudflare's edge network, the ban cascaded and took down the production site.

There's no support on a free Cloudflare plan. There's no support on the $20 plan either. Ben wrote what he described as "all caps lock emails at 30,000 feet" to Cloudflare's senior team, warning them his lawyer was meeting him at the airport. The problem got fixed. An hour later, a senior Cloudflare contact called him back. Not to apologize. To invite him into the partner program. "The mark of an absolutely excellent salesperson, because he realized I was emotionally invested." That call became a reseller agreement, a managed services partnership, and the foundation for ZeroArc.

6. The channel partner model nobody else is running

ZeroArc is built around a simple observation: the enterprise managed security firms (Arctic Wolf, Accenture, and the like) have no agency liaison program. They don't talk to the creative and digital agencies who are actually in the room when the director of marketing says "our emails keep getting spoofed."

Ben's position: that conversation is where client security really begins, and the agency is the first line. Most agencies drop it at "turn on DMARC" because they don't have a path beyond that. ZeroArc's channel program gives agencies a clean referral path with real economics: a percentage of managed services recurring revenue and a larger percentage of reselling. The pitch to agencies isn't white labeling. It's "you own the relationship, we handle the security, everyone wins."

7. Do more with more

Ben's framing on AI is the cleanest contrarian take in the episode. While the industry narrative is "do more with less" (cut staff, deploy AI, shrink overhead), Ben is doing the opposite. He's growing from 12 to 30 and using AI as the work thread that runs through everything.

The logic: a 12-person agency is not a 5,000-person enterprise. The leverage math is different. When you have strong process, domain expertise, and client relationships, AI compounds what's already working. It doesn't replace it. Ben's bet to his team was explicit: I'm investing in you, in benefits, in headcount. In exchange, use these tools to do more. The multiplier goes to the firm, the clients, and the team.

He was equally clear about AI's real limits. Not hardware. Economic and human. "Businesses are still businesses. They're going to have to figure out how to absorb the benefits of all these new tools." And the human side: we still buy from humans, we still process a limited amount of information, and great talent with judgment and curiosity is more valuable, not less.

Notable Quotes

"Your partnership is going to dissolve. One way or the other, your partnership's going to end. So structure it."
"Once it was said out loud, that's it. It's the 'I want a divorce' moment."
"As soon as possible, if you're the one staying, start running. Don't wait until the final closing date. It's too late."
"More is more. Less is a bore. That's our work thread."
"The hype machine is going to keep going, but we're going to hit the limits of just reality."